Colour reversal · 1990s
Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 50
Agfa's slow, neutral slide film.
Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 50 in Reversal mode. Original vs Ashigrain.
At a glance
- Exposure index
- 50
- Daylight
- Introduced
- 1998
- Discontinued
- Process
- E-6
- Prints on
- Reversal, viewed directly
About the film
Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 50 Professional is a daylight ISO 50 colour reversal film in the RSX II range.
Agfa introduced the new family at photokina in 1998, and its September guide lists the 50, 100 and 200-speed members together. The company presented RSX II as a development of the earlier RSX emulsions for professional transparency photography. Agfa described improved linearity near the top of the tone curve and greater maximum density, with both projection and reproduction in mind. Its guide said colour neutrality was retained within one stop of push or pull and changed only slightly at two stops. The film used Agfa AP 44 processing, compatible with E-6, and the guide listed format-specific support thicknesses. A photoscala report in April 2007 said the former professional Agfachrome RSX range was no longer available. It is discontinued, but that report does not establish this film's stock-specific final production year.
Sources for this history
- Agfa Professional Films, Technical Data PF, Agfa-Gevaert AG
- photokina 98: Agfachrome RSX II for precision down to the last detail, Agfa-Gevaert AG
- Agfa-Filme: Das derzeitige Sortiment, photoscala (mts)
The look
Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 50 is a daylight ISO 50 slide film for projection and reproduction, using AP 44 or E-6 processing. Agfa described neutral colour that stayed consistent through moderate push or pull. It defaults to Reversal mode, but the model borrows grain from Kodak Ektachrome 100D.






Best for
- Daylight transparency photography at ISO 50
- Slides intended for projection
- Professional reproduction work
Compare camera films
Science & sources


Tone, spectral and dye data come from Agfa's September 1998 guide, with one visual MTF curve used on every layer. Grain is proxied from Kodak Ektachrome 100D (5294), because the printed RMS 10.0 headline does not specify gross or net density. Push and pull use a generic model.
Response curves and the evidence behind the model
Compare manufacturer data with Ashigrain’s response on the same axes. These curves show how the model is calibrated to its sources; they do not establish a match to photographed film.
Characteristic response
RMS granularity
Density variation (σD) measured through a 48 µm aperture. Where the datasheet gives a single grain value, the response away from that point is an approximation.
| Channel | Density | Datasheet-based σD | Model σD |
|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.3 | 0.005464 | 0.005415 |
| G | 0.3 | 0.003549 | 0.003513 |
| B | 0.3 | 0.00658 | 0.006507 |
| R | 0.6 | 0.010817 | 0.010721 |
| G | 0.6 | 0.007083 | 0.007013 |
| B | 0.6 | 0.015832 | 0.015656 |
| R | 1 | 0.016749 | 0.0166 |
| G | 1 | 0.011309 | 0.011196 |
| B | 1 | 0.02665 | 0.026354 |
| R | 1.5 | 0.024479 | 0.024261 |
| G | 1.5 | 0.017971 | 0.017792 |
| B | 1.5 | 0.041232 | 0.040775 |
| R | 2 | 0.02899 | 0.028732 |
| G | 2 | 0.025049 | 0.024799 |
| B | 2 | 0.059021 | 0.058367 |
Model limits
These images show the film model in use. Spectral response, lighting and viewing conditions include approximations. Halation, bloom, grain size, weave and flicker are not fully measured for each film. The look of real film also depends on development and print timing.
- Custom lighting spectra, camera metering and the spectral reflectance inferred from fixed-white-balance footage are assumptions used by the model, not measurements of this film.
- Conversion-filter spectra (80A for daylight films under tungsten, 85 for tungsten films in daylight) come from separate measured filter data, not from this film’s source. Applying those filters to this film remains modelled.
- Agfa prints an RMS granularity headline but does not state whether its density is gross or net. Grain is proxied from Kodak Ektachrome 100D (5294), so the granularity shown is that film's rather than a measured RSX II grain curve.
- The source prints one visual MTF curve, not separate red, green and blue curves. The model applies it to all three layers.
- Push and pull have no published curves for this film and use a generic model.
- The printed MTF rises above 100 %, which the model renders as a development adjacency effect. Its width, amplitude and dependence on density and development are not published and are approximated.
- The adjacency fit uses two parameters per layer and cannot follow every printed MTF sample. Its dependence on local density differences is also assumed.
- The sheet prints reciprocity corrections at a few exposure times; the correction between them is interpolated, and the colour-compensating filter it prescribes is taken at its nominal value.
- The density curves are calibrated to the printed grid lattice; the zero frame line sits 0.043 density below it. The guide's combined Status A and Status M statement leaves the plotted densitometry unresolved.
- The 1998 and 2003 editions reuse the same artwork, so their agreement is an extraction and calibration check, not independent film measurements.
- The spectral-sensitivity and dye-density drawings are shared with RSX II 100 rather than independent measurements of the 50-speed film.
- The 1998 primary gives resolving power of 125 lines/mm at chart contrast 1000:1; the later edition prints 135. The primary value is retained.
- The guide gives support thicknesses of 120 µm for 135 and 95 µm for roll film but does not name the base material. The physical model uses the 135-film thickness.
- The physical dye-cloud or grain-clump size is inferred from the film's speed class, not measured for this film.
- Individual dye amounts, layer interactions and push/pull behaviour are approximated where the datasheet provides no calibration. Grain size is assumed; published RMS granularity does not specify dye-cloud size.
- The source names no antihalation layer; an undercoat is inferred rather than documented.
- Characteristic response outside the published exposure range is an extrapolation, not measured film data.
- Halation strength, radius and layer weights are not quantified by the datasheet. The effect of removing antihalation and the bloom response are also approximations.
- The available sources do not measure veiling flare during projection. The model approximates its contribution to lifted blacks on screen, so the result is not a measured projection contrast.
Reciprocity: modelled from 1/10000 s to 100 s, following the datasheet's corrections for long and short exposures. Exposure time stops at the ends of that range.
Film guide: assumptions and practical choices
Sources
- Process: Agfa Professional Films, Technical Data PF, Technical Data PF, 09/1998, 1st edition, p. 4
- Characteristic curves: Agfa Professional Films, Technical Data PF, Technical Data PF, 09/1998, 1st edition, p. 8
- Diffuse RMS granularity: Agfa Professional Films, Technical Data PF, Technical Data PF, 09/1998, 1st edition, p. 8
- Exposure index: Agfa Professional Films, Technical Data PF, Technical Data PF, 09/1998, 1st edition, p. 8