Colour reversal · Vivid & saturated

Fujifilm Velvia 50

Velvet grain, colour as you remember it.

Planned media

Very saturated colour and steep contrast for landscapes: deep skies, rich foliage and glowing water. Original vs Ashigrain.

Fujifilm Velvia 50

stock
Fujifilm Velvia 50
mode
Reversal
film_format
35mm still (135)

At a glance

Exposure index
50
Daylight
Introduced
2007
In production
Process
E-6
Prints on
Reversal, viewed directly

About the film

According to Henry Wilhelm's 1993 study of colour permanence, the name Velvia joins “velvet”, for its smooth, fine-grained tones, with “media”, the printed pages it was aimed at.

Fujifilm brought the original to market in early 1990, after professional photographers asked for an E-6 slide film that would beat every other, Kodachrome included, for image quality. Its engineers set out to make a 35 mm frame fine and sharp enough to reproduce at B0 poster size in print, using a new Sigma Crystal grain technology and thinner layers. Wilhelm judged its grain and sharpness about equal to Kodachrome 25, long considered the sharpest slide film in the world. Fujifilm built it around remembered rather than measured colour, and it became a reference for saturated colour among landscape and nature photographers. Production stopped early in 2005 when essential raw materials ran out, and after requests from photographers Fujifilm developed substitute materials and new manufacturing methods. It announced the current Velvia 50 for 2007 and describes it as nearly identical in performance to the original. Velvia also lives on as one of Fujifilm’s digital film simulations.

Sources for this history
  1. FUJICHROME Velvia 50 Professional [RVP 50], FUJIFILM Corporation
  2. Fujifilm Announces Two Reversal Films, Photo Review
  3. Fujifilm Re-Introduces Velvia 50, Photography Blog
  4. FUJICHROME Velvia 50, FUJIFILM North America
  5. The World of Film Simulation episode 3, FUJIFILM Corporation
  6. 超高画質カラーリバーサルフィルム フジクローム「ベルビア」の技術と性能について (日本写真学会誌 55(3), 1992), The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan
  7. The Permanence and Care of Color Photographs, chapter 6 (Henry Wilhelm, 1993), Preservation Publishing

The look

Fujifilm Velvia 50 is a daylight slide film rated EI 50, viewed directly as the positive. Its steep curves and dense shadows push greens, reds and skies towards the colours people remember, with very fine grain.

Planned media

Saturated colour in soft light: punchy, with the steep contrast kept in check.

Fujifilm Velvia 50

stock
Fujifilm Velvia 50
mode
Reversal
film_format
35mm still (135)

Planned media

Blue hour on slide film: deep, saturated blues and a dark sea.

Fujifilm Velvia 50

stock
Fujifilm Velvia 50
mode
Reversal
film_format
35mm still (135)

Best for

  1. Mountain and forest landscapes in low sun
  2. Autumn colour and wildflowers
  3. Seascapes under open sky

Among the films

FilmSpeedGrain, RMS σD · lower is finerYears made
Technicolor Process IITechnicolor Process II−1⅔ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 16−1⅔ stops.0201922
DS-5MDS-5M−⅓ stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 40−⅓ stop.0051979
Kodak Aerochrome III 1443Kodak Aerochrome III 1443−⅓ stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 40−⅓ stop.0242001
Kodak Vision3 50DKodak Vision3 50DMade since 2011, in production · same speed vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 50same speed.0052011–
Fujifilm Velvia 50Fujifilm Velvia 50Made since 2007, in production · this filmEI 50this film.0092007–
Agfa Agfacolor Ultra 50Agfa Agfacolor Ultra 50same speed vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 50same speed.0051995
Kodak Kodachrome 64Kodak Kodachrome 64Made 1974–2009 · +⅓ stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 64+⅓ stop.0121974–2009
Fujifilm Fujichrome 64T Type IIFujifilm Fujichrome 64T Type II+⅓ stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 64+⅓ stop.0102002
Ilford Ortho PlusIlford Ortho PlusMade since 1997, in production · +⅔ stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 80+⅔ stop.0151997–
Polaroid Type 669Polaroid Type 669+⅔ stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 80+⅔ stop.0241981
Svema LN-9Svema LN-9+1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 95+1 stop.0071988
Fujifilm Astia 100FFujifilm Astia 100FMade 2003–2012 · +1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 100+1 stop.0082003–12
Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 100Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 100+1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 100+1 stop.0121998
Agfa Agfacolor Optima II 100Agfa Agfacolor Optima II 100+1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 100+1 stop.0051998
Kodak Ektar 100Kodak Ektar 100Made since 2008, in production · +1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 100+1 stop.0052008–
Kodak Ektachrome 100DKodak Ektachrome 100DMade since 2018, in production · +1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 100+1 stop.0142018–
Fomapan R 100Fomapan R 100Made since 1980, in production · +1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 100+1 stop.0221980–
NK-2NK-2+1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 100+1 stop.0131980
Fujifilm FP-100CFujifilm FP-100CMade 1992–2016 · +1 stop vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 100+1 stop.0231992–2016
Eastman Color Negative 5247Eastman Color Negative 5247+1⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 125+1⅓ stops.0051983
Agfa Agfacolor Portrait XPS 160Agfa Agfacolor Portrait XPS 160+1⅔ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 160+1⅔ stops.0071995
Kodak Vision3 200TKodak Vision3 200TMade since 2010, in production · +2 stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 200+2 stops.0072010–
Kodak Tri-X Reversal 7266Kodak Tri-X Reversal 7266Made since 2003, in production · +2 stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 200+2 stops.0252003–
Kodak Vision3 250DKodak Vision3 250DMade since 2009, in production · +2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 250+2⅓ stops.0072009–
Fujifilm Eterna 250DFujifilm Eterna 250DMade 2005–2013 · +2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 250+2⅓ stops.0042005–13
Kodak Aerocolor IV 2460Kodak Aerocolor IV 2460Made since 2009, in production · +2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 250+2⅓ stops.0132009–
Eastman Double-X 5222Eastman Double-X 5222Made since 1960, in production · +2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 250+2⅓ stops.0151960–
Fujifilm Pro 400HFujifilm Pro 400HMade 2004–2021 · +3 stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 400+3 stops.0042004–21
Kodak Vision3 500TKodak Vision3 500TMade since 2007, in production · +3⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 500+3⅓ stops.0072007–
Kodak Vision2 Expression 500TKodak Vision2 Expression 500T+3⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain the sameEI 500+3⅓ stops.0092003
Fujifilm Eterna 500Fujifilm Eterna 500Made 2004–2013 · +3⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 500+3⅓ stops.0042004–13
Fujifilm Eterna Vivid 500Fujifilm Eterna Vivid 500Made 2009–2013 · +3⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 500+3⅓ stops.0042009–13
Kodak Portra 800Kodak Portra 800Made since 2000, in production · +4 stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain finerEI 800+4 stops.0082000–
Kodak T-Max P3200Kodak T-Max P3200Made since 1988, in production · +4 stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 800+4 stops.0191988–
Kodak Ektachrome P1600Kodak Ektachrome P1600+5 stops vs Fujifilm Velvia 50 · grain coarserEI 1600+5 stops.0381999

Science & sources

Fujifilm Velvia 50 calibration chart: OriginalFujifilm Velvia 50 calibration chart: Processed
Synthetic test chart (grey ramp, ColorChecker, hue sweep, point highlights) before and after the full Ashigrain pipeline: reversal branch, Super 35 4-perf, default controls, exposure +0.92 stops to match the original's mid-grey, frame 0.

A daylight colour reversal film with an exposure index of 50, aimed at strongly saturated colour, with steep curves that reach a maximum green density of about 3.8. Its positive image is shown directly, without a print stage.

Response curves and the evidence behind the model

Compare manufacturer data with the Ashigrain model on the same axes. This shows the calibration to source curves; comparison with photographed film is a separate question.

Characteristic response

Density against log H (lux-seconds) for channels R, G, B. R circles, G squares, B triangles, N diamonds; filled markers and solid lines are digitised, open markers and dashed lines are simulated: digitised and simulated.−3.0−2.0−1.00.01.02.0log H (lux-seconds)0.01.02.03.04.0Density

RMS granularity

RMS granularity (σD) against Density for channels R, G, B. R circles, G squares, B triangles, N diamonds; filled markers and solid lines are datasheet-based, open markers and dashed lines are simulated: datasheet-based and simulated.0.00.51.01.52.0Density0.00.0050.010.015RMS granularity (σD)

Density variation (σD) measured through a 48 µm aperture. Where the datasheet gives a single grain value, the response away from that point is an approximation.

ChannelDensityDatasheet-based σDModel σD
R0.30.004930.005128
G0.30.004930.005139
B0.30.004930.005117
R0.60.0069710.007252
G0.60.0069710.007267
B0.60.0069710.007236
R10.0090.009362
G10.0090.009382
B10.0090.009342
R1.50.0110230.011466
G1.50.0110230.01149
B1.50.0110230.011441
R20.0127280.01324
G20.0127280.013268
B20.0127280.013211

Model limits

These images show the film model in use. Spectral response, lighting and viewing conditions include approximations, while halation, bloom, grain size, weave and flicker are not fully measured for each film. A real film capture also depends on development and print timing.

  • The model assumes custom lighting spectra, camera metering and the spectral reflectance inferred from fixed-white-balance footage. These inputs are not measurements of the film.
  • The spectral transmission of the conversion filter the source prescribes (80A for daylight films under tungsten, 85 for tungsten films in daylight) is modelled, not supplied by the source.
  • The source prints one MTF curve with no densitometry stated, not separate red, green and blue curves. The model applies it to all three layers.
  • The source publishes one RMS granularity value, 9 × 10⁻³. The granularity response away from that level is modelled.
  • The source prints separate cyan, magenta and yellow dye curves but no neutral; the dye scales are taken as printed.
  • No minimum-density spectrum is printed, so the reversal base-density spectrum is approximated. Reversal push and pull have no published curves and use a generic model.
  • The source states a push/pull range of −½ to +1 stop without curves.
  • The antihalation undercoat is printed, but halation strength, radius, layer weights and bloom are not measured.
  • Where calibration data is missing, the model approximates dye amounts, interactions between layers and push/pull behaviour. Grain size is an assumption: published RMS granularity does not determine dye-cloud size.
  • Characteristic response outside the published exposure range is an extrapolation, not measured film data.
  • Modelled projection flare raises screen blacks. Its strength is assumed because the available sources do not measure it, so it does not establish measured projection contrast.

Film guide: assumptions and practical choices

Sources

  1. Exposure index: FUJICHROME Velvia 50 Professional [RVP 50] Data Sheet, AF3-0221E2 (KAMIQ-07.3-FP), p. 1
  2. Process: FUJICHROME Velvia 50 Professional [RVP 50] Data Sheet, AF3-0221E2 (KAMIQ-07.3-FP), p. 3
  3. Diffuse RMS granularity: FUJICHROME Velvia 50 Professional [RVP 50] Data Sheet, AF3-0221E2 (KAMIQ-07.3-FP), p. 7
  4. Characteristic curves: FUJICHROME Velvia 50 Professional [RVP 50] Data Sheet, AF3-0221E2 (KAMIQ-07.3-FP), p. 8

Bring this film into your grade.

Every film is included in one purchase, with no subscription.

€99 + VAT