Colour reversal · Natural

Fujifilm Astia 100F

Fashion's slide film: soft contrast, true skin.

Planned media

Soft, natural slide colour for skin, viewed directly. Original vs Ashigrain.

Fujifilm Astia 100F

stock
Fujifilm Astia 100F
mode
Reversal
film_format
35mm still (135)

At a glance

Exposure index
100
Daylight
Introduced
2003
Discontinued 2012
Process
E-6
Prints on
Reversal, viewed directly

About the film

When Astia 100F went on sale in 2003, Fujifilm’s researchers said it was the first colour slide film to reach an RMS granularity of 7.

It followed the original Astia, which Fujifilm introduced in 1997 for fashion, portrait and commercial work. The new version went further, with softer gradation, wider latitude and smoother skin, and Vividlight noted that the old Astia had measured RMS 10 and the previous record holder, Provia 100F, RMS 8. Extra fifth and sixth colour-correction layers, grown from Fujifilm’s fourth-colour-layer technology, brought its colour sensitivity closer to the eye’s and reduced colour shifts between light sources. Fujifilm’s UK director Graham Rutherford said fashion magazines now wanted more subdued, natural skin tones, and that the film had been tailored to that trend. Fujifilm called it the softest in tone and most muted in colour of all its Fujichrome films. It announced the end of 35 mm Astia 100F in December 2010 and named Provia 100F as the replacement. The last 120, 220 and sheet film was due to ship in March 2012, which ended the Astia name altogether.

Sources for this history
  1. FUJICHROME ASTIA 100F Professional [RAP100F] Data Sheet, FUJIFILM Corporation
  2. 新カラーリバーサルフィルム フジクローム「Velvia 100F/100」,「ASTIA 100F」の開発 (FUJIFILM RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT No. 49), FUJIFILM Corporation
  3. フジクロームASTIA100の開発 (FUJIFILM RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT No. 43), FUJIFILM Corporation
  4. Fujichrome Astia 100F Professional [RAP 100F], Timeline of Historical Film Colors
  5. Fujifilm Professional's Astia 100F out now, ePHOTOzine
  6. Fujifilm Astia 100F, Vividlight
  7. 富士フイルム、35mm判の「アスティア100F」と「ネオパン1600 Super PRESTO」を販売終了, デジカメ Watch
  8. 富士フイルム、一部銀塩フィルムの販売終了, デジカメ Watch

The look

Fujifilm Astia 100F is a daylight slide film rated EI 100, viewed directly as the positive. Fujifilm made it the softest and most muted of its Fujichrome films, keeping skin smooth from highlight to shadow where Velvia would turn hard.

Planned media

Low-contrast daylight: subdued colour and gentle tones.

Fujifilm Astia 100F

stock
Fujifilm Astia 100F
mode
Reversal
film_format
35mm still (135)

Planned media

Skin from highlight to shadow on a soft slide film.

Fujifilm Astia 100F

stock
Fujifilm Astia 100F
mode
Reversal
film_format
35mm still (135)

Best for

  1. Fashion and beauty portraits in daylight
  2. Skin under hard midday sun
  3. Bright scenes that need open shadows

Among the films

FilmSpeedGrain, RMS σD · lower is finerYears made
Technicolor Process IITechnicolor Process II−2⅔ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 16−2⅔ stops.0201922
DS-5MDS-5M−1⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 40−1⅓ stops.0051979
Kodak Aerochrome III 1443Kodak Aerochrome III 1443−1⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 40−1⅓ stops.0242001
Kodak Vision3 50DKodak Vision3 50DMade since 2011, in production · −1 stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 50−1 stop.0052011–
Fujifilm Velvia 50Fujifilm Velvia 50Made since 2007, in production · −1 stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 50−1 stop.0092007–
Agfa Agfacolor Ultra 50Agfa Agfacolor Ultra 50−1 stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 50−1 stop.0051995
Kodak Kodachrome 64Kodak Kodachrome 64Made 1974–2009 · −⅔ stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 64−⅔ stop.0121974–2009
Fujifilm Fujichrome 64T Type IIFujifilm Fujichrome 64T Type II−⅔ stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 64−⅔ stop.0102002
Ilford Ortho PlusIlford Ortho PlusMade since 1997, in production · −⅓ stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 80−⅓ stop.0151997–
Polaroid Type 669Polaroid Type 669−⅓ stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 80−⅓ stop.0241981
Svema LN-9Svema LN-9same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 95same speed.0071988
Fujifilm Astia 100FFujifilm Astia 100FMade 2003–2012 · this filmEI 100this film.0082003–12
Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 100Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 100same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 100same speed.0121998
Agfa Agfacolor Optima II 100Agfa Agfacolor Optima II 100same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 100same speed.0051998
Kodak Ektar 100Kodak Ektar 100Made since 2008, in production · same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 100same speed.0052008–
Kodak Ektachrome 100DKodak Ektachrome 100DMade since 2018, in production · same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 100same speed.0142018–
Fomapan R 100Fomapan R 100Made since 1980, in production · same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 100same speed.0221980–
NK-2NK-2same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 100same speed.0131980
Fujifilm FP-100CFujifilm FP-100CMade 1992–2016 · same speed vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 100same speed.0231992–2016
Eastman Color Negative 5247Eastman Color Negative 5247+⅓ stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 125+⅓ stop.0051983
Agfa Agfacolor Portrait XPS 160Agfa Agfacolor Portrait XPS 160+⅔ stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 160+⅔ stop.0071995
Kodak Vision3 200TKodak Vision3 200TMade since 2010, in production · +1 stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 200+1 stop.0072010–
Kodak Tri-X Reversal 7266Kodak Tri-X Reversal 7266Made since 2003, in production · +1 stop vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 200+1 stop.0252003–
Kodak Vision3 250DKodak Vision3 250DMade since 2009, in production · +1⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 250+1⅓ stops.0072009–
Fujifilm Eterna 250DFujifilm Eterna 250DMade 2005–2013 · +1⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 250+1⅓ stops.0042005–13
Kodak Aerocolor IV 2460Kodak Aerocolor IV 2460Made since 2009, in production · +1⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 250+1⅓ stops.0132009–
Eastman Double-X 5222Eastman Double-X 5222Made since 1960, in production · +1⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 250+1⅓ stops.0151960–
Fujifilm Pro 400HFujifilm Pro 400HMade 2004–2021 · +2 stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 400+2 stops.0042004–21
Kodak Vision3 500TKodak Vision3 500TMade since 2007, in production · +2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 500+2⅓ stops.0072007–
Kodak Vision2 Expression 500TKodak Vision2 Expression 500T+2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 500+2⅓ stops.0092003
Fujifilm Eterna 500Fujifilm Eterna 500Made 2004–2013 · +2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 500+2⅓ stops.0042004–13
Fujifilm Eterna Vivid 500Fujifilm Eterna Vivid 500Made 2009–2013 · +2⅓ stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain finerEI 500+2⅓ stops.0042009–13
Kodak Portra 800Kodak Portra 800Made since 2000, in production · +3 stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain the sameEI 800+3 stops.0082000–
Kodak T-Max P3200Kodak T-Max P3200Made since 1988, in production · +3 stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 800+3 stops.0191988–
Kodak Ektachrome P1600Kodak Ektachrome P1600+4 stops vs Fujifilm Astia 100F · grain coarserEI 1600+4 stops.0381999

Science & sources

Fujifilm Astia 100F calibration chart: OriginalFujifilm Astia 100F calibration chart: Processed
Synthetic test chart (grey ramp, ColorChecker, hue sweep, point highlights) before and after the full Ashigrain pipeline: reversal branch, Super 35 4-perf, default controls, exposure +0.50 stops to match the original's mid-grey, frame 0.

A daylight colour reversal film with an exposure index of 100, softer in tone and colour than Velvia 50. Its positive image is shown directly, without a print stage.

Response curves and the evidence behind the model

Compare manufacturer data with the Ashigrain model on the same axes. This shows the calibration to source curves; comparison with photographed film is a separate question.

Characteristic response

Density against log H (lux-seconds) for channels R, G, B. R circles, G squares, B triangles, N diamonds; filled markers and solid lines are digitised, open markers and dashed lines are simulated: digitised and simulated.−4.0−3.0−2.0−1.00.01.0log H (lux-seconds)0.01.02.03.04.0Density

RMS granularity

RMS granularity (σD) against Density for channels R, G, B. R circles, G squares, B triangles, N diamonds; filled markers and solid lines are datasheet-based, open markers and dashed lines are simulated: datasheet-based and simulated.0.00.51.01.52.0Density0.00.00250.0050.00750.010.0125RMS granularity (σD)

Density variation (σD) measured through a 48 µm aperture. Where the datasheet gives a single grain value, the response away from that point is an approximation.

ChannelDensityDatasheet-based σDModel σD
R0.30.004120.004286
G0.30.004120.004295
B0.30.004120.004272
R0.60.0058260.006061
G0.60.0058260.006073
B0.60.0058260.006041
R10.0075220.007824
G10.0075220.007841
B10.0075220.007799
R1.50.0092120.009583
G1.50.0092120.009603
B1.50.0092120.009552
R20.0106370.011065
G20.0106370.011089
B20.0106370.01103

Model limits

These images show the film model in use. Spectral response, lighting and viewing conditions include approximations, while halation, bloom, grain size, weave and flicker are not fully measured for each film. A real film capture also depends on development and print timing.

  • Custom lighting spectra, camera metering and the spectral reflectance inferred from fixed-white-balance footage are modeled assumptions, not measurements of this film.
  • The spectral transmission of the conversion filter the source prescribes (80A for daylight films under tungsten, 85 for tungsten films in daylight) is modeled, not supplied by the source.
  • The source prints one visual MTF curve, not separate red, green and blue curves. The model applies it to all three layers.
  • The only grain value is RMS granularity 7 × 10⁻³, read at a gross (not net) visual density of 1.0. Its conversion to net density and the response away from that point are modeled.
  • The source prints separate cyan, magenta and yellow dye curves, each normalised to a peak of 1.0, and no neutral; the dye scales are fitted assumptions.
  • No minimum-density spectrum is printed, so the reversal base-density spectrum is approximated. Reversal push and pull have no published curves and use a generic model.
  • The source states a push/pull range of −½ to +2 stops without curves.
  • The antihalation undercoat is printed, but halation strength, radius, layer weights and bloom are not measured.
  • Individual dye amounts, layer interactions and push/pull behaviour are approximated where the datasheet provides no calibration. Grain size is assumed; published RMS granularity does not specify dye-cloud size.
  • Characteristic response outside the published exposure range is an extrapolation, not measured film data.
  • Veiling projection flare is not measured in the available sources. Its modeled contribution lifts screen blacks; it is not a measured projection-contrast claim.

Film guide: assumptions and practical choices

Sources

  1. Exposure index: FUJICHROME ASTIA 100F Professional [RAP100F] Data Sheet, AF3-149E (EIGI-03.11-HB•5-3), p. 1
  2. Process: FUJICHROME ASTIA 100F Professional [RAP100F] Data Sheet, AF3-149E (EIGI-03.11-HB•5-3), p. 3
  3. Characteristic curves: FUJICHROME ASTIA 100F Professional [RAP100F] Data Sheet, AF3-149E (EIGI-03.11-HB•5-3), p. 8
  4. Diffuse RMS granularity: FUJICHROME ASTIA 100F Professional [RAP100F] Data Sheet, AF3-149E (EIGI-03.11-HB•5-3), p. 8

Bring this film into your grade.

Every film is included in one purchase, with no subscription.

€99 + VAT